[haskell-llvm] pushing llvm-base with patched setup.hs to hackage

[Henning Thielemann]

On Fri, 17 May 2013, Carter Schonwald wrote:

> 1)  is there anyone actually going to use HUGs and LLVM 3.2 together? Really? Who are they? Is it more than
> 1 person? 

It's not about using Hugs and LLVM together, it's that Hugs starts much 
more quickly than ghc and thus it is better suited as interpreter. Thus it 
is very reasonable to map "runhaskell" to "runhugs" instead of "runghc".